OMGeeky/google-apis-rs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/OMGeeky/google-apis-rs.git synced 2026-02-23 15:49:49 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

And once again, python string handling bit me...

Browse Source 
...so sick of it. No python, ever again.
Why, but why did I chose Mako back then :D?
This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Thiel
2019-07-05 17:26:22 +08:00
parent 3365d9fba1
commit 4ceeac6320
2 changed files with 143 additions and 140 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

279
gen/cloudresourcemanager1/src/lib.rs
View File

@@ -533,7 +533,6 @@ impl Part for RestoreDefault {}
/// Defines an Identity and Access Management (IAM) policy. It is used to
/// specify access control policies for Cloud Platform resources.
///
///
/// A `Policy` consists of a list of `bindings`. A `binding` binds a list of
/// `members` to a `role`, where the members can be user accounts, Google groups,
/// Google domains, and service accounts. A `role` is a named list of permissions
@@ -541,37 +540,40 @@ impl Part for RestoreDefault {}
///
/// **JSON Example**
///
/// ````text
/// {
/// "bindings": [
/// {
/// "bindings": [
/// {
/// "role": "roles/owner",
/// "members": [
/// "user:mike@example.com",
/// "group:admins@example.com",
/// "domain:google.com",
/// "serviceAccount:my-other-app@appspot.gserviceaccount.com"
/// ]
/// },
/// {
/// "role": "roles/viewer",
/// "members": ["user:sean@example.com"]
/// }
/// "role": "roles/owner",
/// "members": [
/// "user:mike@example.com",
/// "group:admins@example.com",
/// "domain:google.com",
/// "serviceAccount:my-other-app@appspot.gserviceaccount.com"
/// ]
/// },
/// {
/// "role": "roles/viewer",
/// "members": ["user:sean@example.com"]
/// }
/// ]
/// }
/// ````
///
/// **YAML Example**
///
/// bindings:
/// - members:
/// - user:mike@example.com
/// - group:admins@example.com
/// - domain:google.com
/// - serviceAccount:my-other-app@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
/// role: roles/owner
/// - members:
/// - user:sean@example.com
/// role: roles/viewer
///
/// ````text
/// bindings:
/// - members:
/// - user:mike@example.com
/// - group:admins@example.com
/// - domain:google.com
/// - serviceAccount:my-other-app@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
/// role: roles/owner
/// - members:
/// - user:sean@example.com
/// role: roles/viewer
/// ````
///
/// For a description of IAM and its features, see the
/// [IAM developer's guide](https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs).
@@ -585,7 +587,6 @@ impl Part for RestoreDefault {}
/// * [set iam policy organizations](struct.OrganizationSetIamPolicyCall.html) (response)
/// * [get iam policy projects](struct.ProjectGetIamPolicyCall.html) (response)
/// * [get iam policy organizations](struct.OrganizationGetIamPolicyCall.html) (response)
///
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct Policy {
/// Specifies cloud audit logging configuration for this policy.
@@ -630,9 +631,11 @@ impl Part for Ancestor {}
/// empty messages in your APIs. A typical example is to use it as the request
/// or the response type of an API method. For instance:
///
/// service Foo {
/// rpc Bar(google.protobuf.Empty) returns (google.protobuf.Empty);
/// }
/// ````text
/// service Foo {
/// rpc Bar(google.protobuf.Empty) returns (google.protobuf.Empty);
/// }
/// ````
///
/// The JSON representation for `Empty` is empty JSON object `{}`.
///
@@ -647,7 +650,6 @@ impl Part for Ancestor {}
/// * [delete liens](struct.LienDeleteCall.html) (response)
/// * [clear org policy organizations](struct.OrganizationClearOrgPolicyCall.html) (response)
/// * [clear org policy projects](struct.ProjectClearOrgPolicyCall.html) (response)
///
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct Empty { _never_set: Option<bool> }
@@ -781,9 +783,9 @@ impl Part for ResourceId {}
/// if the value contains a ":". Values prefixed with "is:" are treated the
/// same as values with no prefix.
/// Ancestry subtrees must be in one of the following formats:
/// - “projects/<project-id>”, e.g. “projects/tokyo-rain-123”
/// - “folders/<folder-id>”, e.g. “folders/1234”
/// - “organizations/<organization-id>”, e.g. “organizations/1234”
/// - “projects/<project-id>”, e.g. “projects/tokyo-rain-123”
/// - “folders/<folder-id>”, e.g. “folders/1234”
/// - “organizations/<organization-id>”, e.g. “organizations/1234”
/// The `supports_under` field of the associated `Constraint` defines whether
/// ancestry prefixes can be used. You can set `allowed_values` and
/// `denied_values` in the same `Policy` if `all_values` is
@@ -792,7 +794,6 @@ impl Part for ResourceId {}
/// `allowed_values` and `denied_values` must be unset.
///
/// This type is not used in any activity, and only used as *part* of another schema.
///
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct ListPolicy {
/// The policy all_values state.
@@ -830,75 +831,73 @@ pub struct ListPolicy {
/// `projects/bar` parented by `organizations/foo`:
///
/// Example 1 (no inherited values):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values:”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has `inherit_from_parent` `false` and values:
/// {allowed_values: "E3" allowed_values: "E4"}
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values:”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has `inherit_from_parent` `false` and values:
/// {allowed_values: "E3" allowed_values: "E4"}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, `E2`.
/// The accepted values at `projects/bar` are `E3`, and `E4`.
///
/// Example 2 (inherited values):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values:”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {value: “E3” value: ”E4” inherit_from_parent: true}
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values:”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {value: “E3” value: ”E4” inherit_from_parent: true}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, `E2`.
/// The accepted values at `projects/bar` are `E1`, `E2`, `E3`, and `E4`.
///
/// Example 3 (inheriting both allowed and denied values):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: "E1" allowed_values: "E2"}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {denied_values: "E1"}
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: "E1" allowed_values: "E2"}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {denied_values: "E1"}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, `E2`.
/// The value accepted at `projects/bar` is `E2`.
///
/// Example 4 (RestoreDefault):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values:”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {RestoreDefault: {}}
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values:”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {RestoreDefault: {}}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, `E2`.
/// The accepted values at `projects/bar` are either all or none depending on
/// the value of `constraint_default` (if `ALLOW`, all; if
/// `DENY`, none).
///
/// Example 5 (no policy inherits parent policy):
/// `organizations/foo` has no `Policy` set.
/// `projects/bar` has no `Policy` set.
/// `organizations/foo` has no `Policy` set.
/// `projects/bar` has no `Policy` set.
/// The accepted values at both levels are either all or none depending on
/// the value of `constraint_default` (if `ALLOW`, all; if
/// `DENY`, none).
///
/// Example 6 (ListConstraint allowing all):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values: ”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {all: ALLOW}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, E2`.
/// Any value is accepted at `projects/bar`.
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values: ”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {all: ALLOW}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, E2`. Any value is accepted at `projects/bar`.
///
/// Example 7 (ListConstraint allowing none):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values: ”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {all: DENY}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, E2`.
/// No value is accepted at `projects/bar`.
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: “E1” allowed_values: ”E2”}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {all: DENY}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `E1`, E2`. No value is accepted at `projects/bar`.
///
/// Example 10 (allowed and denied subtrees of Resource Manager hierarchy):
/// Given the following resource hierarchy
/// O1->{F1, F2}; F1->{P1}; F2->{P2, P3},
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: "under:organizations/O1"}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {allowed_values: "under:projects/P3"}
/// {denied_values: "under:folders/F2"}
/// O1->{F1, F2}; F1->{P1}; F2->{P2, P3},
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with values:
/// {allowed_values: "under:organizations/O1"}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {allowed_values: "under:projects/P3"}
/// {denied_values: "under:folders/F2"}
/// The accepted values at `organizations/foo` are `organizations/O1`,
/// `folders/F1`, `folders/F2`, `projects/P1`, `projects/P2`,
/// `projects/P3`.
/// `folders/F1`, `folders/F2`, `projects/P1`, `projects/P2`,
/// `projects/P3`.
/// The accepted values at `projects/bar` are `organizations/O1`,
/// `folders/F1`, `projects/P1`.
/// `folders/F1`, `projects/P1`.
#[serde(rename="inheritFromParent")]
pub inherit_from_parent: Option<bool>,
/// Optional. The Google Cloud Console will try to default to a configuration
@@ -930,40 +929,41 @@ pub struct BooleanPolicy {
/// `constraints/compute.disableSerialPortAccess` with `constraint_default`
/// set to `ALLOW`. A `Policy` for that `Constraint` exhibits the following
/// behavior:
/// - If the `Policy` at this resource has enforced set to `false`, serial
/// port connection attempts will be allowed.
/// - If the `Policy` at this resource has enforced set to `true`, serial
/// port connection attempts will be refused.
/// - If the `Policy` at this resource is `RestoreDefault`, serial port
/// connection attempts will be allowed.
/// - If no `Policy` is set at this resource or anywhere higher in the
/// resource hierarchy, serial port connection attempts will be allowed.
/// - If no `Policy` is set at this resource, but one exists higher in the
/// resource hierarchy, the behavior is as if the`Policy` were set at
/// this resource.
///
/// * If the `Policy` at this resource has enforced set to `false`, serial
/// port connection attempts will be allowed.
/// * If the `Policy` at this resource has enforced set to `true`, serial
/// port connection attempts will be refused.
/// * If the `Policy` at this resource is `RestoreDefault`, serial port
/// connection attempts will be allowed.
/// * If no `Policy` is set at this resource or anywhere higher in the
/// resource hierarchy, serial port connection attempts will be allowed.
/// * If no `Policy` is set at this resource, but one exists higher in the
/// resource hierarchy, the behavior is as if the`Policy` were set at
/// this resource.
///
/// The following examples demonstrate the different possible layerings:
///
/// Example 1 (nearest `Constraint` wins):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: false}
/// `projects/bar` has no `Policy` set.
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: false}
/// `projects/bar` has no `Policy` set.
/// The constraint at `projects/bar` and `organizations/foo` will not be
/// enforced.
///
/// Example 2 (enforcement gets replaced):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: false}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: true}
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: false}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: true}
/// The constraint at `organizations/foo` is not enforced.
/// The constraint at `projects/bar` is enforced.
///
/// Example 3 (RestoreDefault):
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: true}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {RestoreDefault: {}}
/// `organizations/foo` has a `Policy` with:
/// {enforced: true}
/// `projects/bar` has a `Policy` with:
/// {RestoreDefault: {}}
/// The constraint at `organizations/foo` is enforced.
/// The constraint at `projects/bar` is not enforced, because
/// `constraint_default` for the `Constraint` is `ALLOW`.
@@ -975,12 +975,13 @@ impl Part for BooleanPolicy {}
/// Represents an expression text. Example:
///
/// title: "User account presence"
/// description: "Determines whether the request has a user account"
/// expression: "size(request.user) > 0"
/// ````text
/// title: "User account presence"
/// description: "Determines whether the request has a user account"
/// expression: "size(request.user) > 0"
/// ````
///
/// This type is not used in any activity, and only used as *part* of another schema.
///
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct Expr {
/// An optional description of the expression. This is a longer text which
@@ -1027,25 +1028,26 @@ impl RequestValue for SetOrgPolicyRequest {}
/// Provides the configuration for logging a type of permissions.
/// Example:
///
/// ````text
/// {
/// "audit_log_configs": [
/// {
/// "audit_log_configs": [
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_READ",
/// "exempted_members": [
/// "user:foo@gmail.com"
/// ]
/// },
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_WRITE",
/// }
/// "log_type": "DATA_READ",
/// "exempted_members": [
/// "user:foo@gmail.com"
/// ]
/// },
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_WRITE",
/// }
/// ]
/// }
/// ````
///
/// This enables 'DATA_READ' and 'DATA_WRITE' logging, while exempting
/// foo@gmail.com from DATA_READ logging.
///
/// This type is not used in any activity, and only used as *part* of another schema.
///
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct AuditLogConfig {
/// Specifies the identities that do not cause logging for this type of
@@ -1594,48 +1596,49 @@ impl Part for Binding {}
///
/// Example Policy with multiple AuditConfigs:
///
/// ````text
/// {
/// "audit_configs": [
/// {
/// "audit_configs": [
/// "service": "allServices"
/// "audit_log_configs": [
/// {
/// "service": "allServices"
/// "audit_log_configs": [
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_READ",
/// "exempted_members": [
/// "user:foo@gmail.com"
/// ]
/// },
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_WRITE",
/// },
/// {
/// "log_type": "ADMIN_READ",
/// }
/// "log_type": "DATA_READ",
/// "exempted_members": [
/// "user:foo@gmail.com"
/// ]
/// },
/// {
/// "service": "fooservice.googleapis.com"
/// "audit_log_configs": [
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_READ",
/// },
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_WRITE",
/// "exempted_members": [
/// "user:bar@gmail.com"
/// ]
/// }
/// "log_type": "DATA_WRITE",
/// },
/// {
/// "log_type": "ADMIN_READ",
/// }
/// ]
/// },
/// {
/// "service": "fooservice.googleapis.com"
/// "audit_log_configs": [
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_READ",
/// },
/// {
/// "log_type": "DATA_WRITE",
/// "exempted_members": [
/// "user:bar@gmail.com"
/// ]
/// }
/// ]
/// }
/// ]
/// }
/// ````
///
/// For fooservice, this policy enables DATA_READ, DATA_WRITE and ADMIN_READ
/// logging. It also exempts foo@gmail.com from DATA_READ logging, and
/// bar@gmail.com from DATA_WRITE logging.
///
/// This type is not used in any activity, and only used as *part* of another schema.
///
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct AuditConfig {
/// The configuration for logging of each type of permission.