Send bound from FutureService (#96)
* Make a reactor handle mandatory for server. This removes the Send bound from FutureService. The Send bound is still required for SyncService, since clones are sent to new threads for each request. (This is more fodder for the argument that there should be a distinct Options struct for each combination of async/sync and client/server.) This commit also makes FutureService::listen return an io::Result rather than a Future; the future was never really necessary and had the unintended consequence of making SyncService::listen deadlock when the options specified a handle (because that means the reactor driving the service lives on the same thread that SyncService is waiting on). `SyncClient` is no longer `Clone` because it needs to create a new `reactor::Core` when cloning. Tokio Clients are `Clone` but they don't allow moving the cloned client onto a new reactor. * Change pubsub to use Rc<Refcell<>> instead of Arc<Mutex<>>. This is possible since services no longer need to be Send. * Remove some unnecessary unstable features. There 3 remaining unstable features. The hardest to remove is plugin, because we rely on compiler plugins to rewrite types from snake case to camel. It's possible this can be removed before the proc macros rewrite lands if impl Trait is extended to work with traits. * Clean up example * Sync servers now spawn a reactor on a thread. It's decided that sync users should not have to know about tokio at all. * Don't allow specifying a reactor::Core on client options. * Fail fast in server::listen if local_addr() returns Err.
tarpc: Tim & Adam's RPC lib
Disclaimer: This is not an official Google product.
tarpc is an RPC framework for rust with a focus on ease of use. Defining a service can be done in just a few lines of code, and most of the boilerplate of writing a server is taken care of for you.
What is an RPC framework?
"RPC" stands for "Remote Procedure Call," a function call where the work of producing the return value is being done somewhere else. When an rpc function is invoked, behind the scenes the function contacts some other process somewhere and asks them to evaluate the function instead. The original function then returns the value produced by the other process.
RPC frameworks are a fundamental building block of most microservices-oriented architectures. Two well-known ones are gRPC and Cap'n Proto.
tarpc differentiates itself from other RPC frameworks by defining the schema in code, rather than in a separate language such as .proto. This means there's no separate compilation process, and no cognitive context switching between different languages. Additionally, it works with the community-backed library serde: any serde-serializable type can be used as arguments to tarpc fns.
Usage
NB: this example is for master. Are you looking for other versions?
Add to your Cargo.toml dependencies:
tarpc = { git = "https://github.com/google/tarpc" }
tarpc-plugins = { git = "https://github.com/google/tarpc" }
Example
// required by `FutureClient` (not used directly in this example)
#![feature(conservative_impl_trait, plugin)]
#![plugin(tarpc_plugins)]
extern crate futures;
#[macro_use]
extern crate tarpc;
extern crate tokio_core;
use tarpc::{client, server};
use tarpc::client::sync::Connect;
use tarpc::util::{FirstSocketAddr, Never};
use tokio_core::reactor;
service! {
rpc hello(name: String) -> String;
}
#[derive(Clone)]
struct HelloServer;
impl SyncService for HelloServer {
fn hello(&self, name: String) -> Result<String, Never> {
Ok(format!("Hello, {}!", name))
}
}
fn main() {
let reactor = reactor::Core::new().unwrap();
let addr = HelloServer.listen("localhost:0".first_socket_addr(),
server::Options::default())
.unwrap();
let mut client = SyncClient::connect(addr, client::Options::default()).unwrap();
println!("{}", client.hello("Mom".to_string()).unwrap());
}
The service! macro expands to a collection of items that form an
rpc service. In the above example, the macro is called within the
hello_service module. This module will contain SyncClient, AsyncClient,
and FutureClient types, and SyncService and AsyncService traits. There is
also a ServiceExt trait that provides starter fns for services, with an
umbrella impl for all services. These generated types make it easy and
ergonomic to write servers without dealing with sockets or serialization
directly. Simply implement one of the generated traits, and you're off to the
races! See the tarpc_examples package for more examples.
Example: Futures
Here's the same service, implemented using futures.
#![feature(conservative_impl_trait, plugin)]
#![plugin(tarpc_plugins)]
extern crate futures;
#[macro_use]
extern crate tarpc;
extern crate tokio_core;
use futures::Future;
use tarpc::{client, server};
use tarpc::client::future::ClientExt;
use tarpc::util::{FirstSocketAddr, Never};
use tokio_core::reactor;
service! {
rpc hello(name: String) -> String;
}
#[derive(Clone)]
struct HelloServer;
impl FutureService for HelloServer {
type HelloFut = futures::Finished<String, Never>;
fn hello(&self, name: String) -> Self::HelloFut {
futures::finished(format!("Hello, {}!", name))
}
}
fn main() {
let mut core = reactor::Core::new().unwrap();
let addr = HelloServer.listen("localhost:10000".first_socket_addr(),
server::Options::from(core.handle()))
.unwrap();
let options = client::Options::default().handle(core.handle());
core.run(FutureClient::connect(addr, options)
.map_err(tarpc::Error::from)
.and_then(|client| client.hello("Mom".to_string()))
.map(|resp| println!("{}", resp)))
.unwrap();
}
Example: Futures + TLS
By default, tarpc internally uses a TcpStream for communication between your clients and
servers. However, TCP by itself has no encryption. As a result, your communication will be sent in
the clear. If you want your RPC communications to be encrypted, you can choose to use TLS. TLS
operates as an encryption layer on top of TCP. When using TLS, your communication will occur over a
TlsStream<TcpStream>. You can add the ability to make TLS clients and servers by adding tarpc
with the tls feature flag enabled.
When using TLS, some additional information is required. You will need to make TlsAcceptor and
client::tls::Context structs; client::tls::Context requires a TlsConnector. The
TlsAcceptor and TlsConnector types are defined in the native-tls. tarpc re-exports
external TLS-related types in its native_tls module (tarpc::native_tls).
Both TLS streams and TCP streams are supported in the same binary when the tls feature is enabled.
However, if you are working with both stream types, ensure that you use the TLS clients with TLS
servers and TCP clients with TCP servers.
#![feature(conservative_impl_trait, plugin)]
#![plugin(tarpc_plugins)]
extern crate futures;
#[macro_use]
extern crate tarpc;
extern crate tokio_core;
use futures::Future;
use tarpc::{client, server};
use tarpc::client::future::ClientExt;
use tarpc::util::{FirstSocketAddr, Never};
use tokio_core::reactor;
use tarpc::native_tls::{Pkcs12, TlsAcceptor};
service! {
rpc hello(name: String) -> String;
}
#[derive(Clone)]
struct HelloServer;
impl FutureService for HelloServer {
type HelloFut = futures::Finished<String, Never>;
fn hello(&mut self, name: String) -> Self::HelloFut {
futures::finished(format!("Hello, {}!", name))
}
}
fn get_acceptor() -> TlsAcceptor {
let buf = include_bytes!("test/identity.p12");
let pkcs12 = Pkcs12::from_der(buf, "password").unwrap();
TlsAcceptor::builder(pkcs12).unwrap().build().unwrap()
}
fn main() {
let mut core = reactor::Core::new().unwrap();
let acceptor = get_acceptor();
let addr = HelloServer.listen("localhost:10000".first_socket_addr(),
server::Options::from(core.handle())
.tls(acceptor))
.unwrap();
let options = client::Options::default()
.handle(core.handle())
.tls(client::tls::Context::new("foobar.com").unwrap()));
core.run(FutureClient::connect(addr, options)
.map_err(tarpc::Error::from)
.and_then(|client| client.hello("Mom".to_string()))
.map(|resp| println!("{}", resp)))
.unwrap();
}
Tips
Sync vs Futures
A single service! invocation generates code for both synchronous and future-based applications.
It's up to the user whether they want to implement the sync API or the futures API. The sync API has
the simplest programming model, at the cost of some overhead - each RPC is handled in its own
thread. The futures API is based on tokio and can run on any tokio-compatible executor. This mean a
service that implements the futures API for a tarpc service can run on a single thread, avoiding
context switches and the memory overhead of having a thread per RPC.
Errors
All generated tarpc RPC methods return either tarpc::Result<T, E> or something like Future<T, E>. The error type defaults to tarpc::util::Never (a wrapper for ! which implements
std::error::Error) if no error type is explicitly specified in the service! macro invocation. An
error type can be specified like so:
use tarpc::util::Message;
service! {
rpc hello(name: String) -> String | Message
}
tarpc::util::Message is just a wrapper around string that implements std::error::Error provided
for service implementations that don't require complex error handling. The pipe is used as syntax
for specifying the error type in a way that's agnostic of whether the service implementation is
synchronous or future-based. Note that in the simpler examples in the readme, no pipe is used, and
the macro automatically chooses tarpc::util::Never as the error type.
The above declaration would produce the following synchronous service trait:
impl SyncService for HelloServer {
fn hello(&self, name: String) -> Result<String, Message> {
Ok(format!("Hello, {}!", name))
}
}
and the following future-based trait:
impl FutureService for HelloServer {
type HelloFut = futures::Finished<String, Message>;
fn hello(&mut self, name: String) -> Self::HelloFut {
futures::finished(format!("Hello, {}!", name))
}
}
Documentation
Use cargo doc as you normally would to see the documentation created for all
items expanded by a service! invocation.
Additional Features
- Concurrent requests from a single client.
- Compatible with tokio services.
- Run any number of clients and services on a single event loop.
- Any type that
implsserde'sSerializeandDeserializecan be used in rpc signatures. - Attributes can be specified on rpc methods. These will be included on both the services' trait methods as well as on the clients' stub methods.
Gaps/Potential Improvements (not necessarily actively being worked on)
- Configurable server rate limiting.
- Automatic client retries with exponential backoff when server is busy.
- Load balancing
- Service discovery
- Automatically reconnect on the client side when the connection cuts out.
- Support generic serialization protocols.
Contributing
To contribute to tarpc, please see CONTRIBUTING.
License
tarpc is distributed under the terms of the MIT license.
See LICENSE for details.
